MACHINE LEARNING-GUIDED PREDICTION OF OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SCTG AND L-PRF SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION

Received by the Editorial Office: April 14, 2026
Accepted for publication: May 22, 2026
Published online: June 30, 2026
UDC: 616.314-089.843

DOI: 10.70113/1815-9443.2026.51.29.012

MACHINE LEARNING-GUIDED PREDICTION OF OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SCTG AND L-PRF SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION

Azhibekov A.S. 1, MenchishevaYu.A. 1, Yerkibayeva Zh.U. 1

1Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

 

Introduction. Peri-implant soft tissue deficiency in the posterior mandible remains a significant clinical challenge. Although subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) combined with lekocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes, individualised prediction of treatment success remains insufficiently investigated. Machine learning approaches may provide new opportunities for personalised treatment planning in implant dentistry.

Objective. To evaluate the feasibility of machine learning based prediction of peri-implant soft tissue augmentation outcomes following SCTG and L-PRF augnentation and to identify the clinical variables most strongly associated with treatment success.

Materials and methods. This study represents a secondary exploratory machine learning analysis based on data obtained from a previously conducted randomised controlled clinical trial. The final dataset included 92  patients who  completed 6-month follow-up after peri-implant soft tissue augmentation procedures, including 47 patients treated with SCTG combined with L-PRF and 45 patients treated with SCTG alone. Baseline demographic, clinical immunological and peri-implant soft tissue variables were included in the analysis. Predictive modelling was performed using Python and the scikit-learn  library. Random Forest and multilayer perceptron algorithms were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

Results. Favorable clinical outcomes at 6 months were observed in 79 patients (85.9%), whereas 13 patients (14.1%) demonstrated suboptimal peri-implant soft tissue or aesthetic outcomes. The Random Forest classifier demonstrated more stable predictive performance compared with the multilayer perceptron model. The exploratory Random Forest model demonstrated a mean accuracy of 0.81, precision of 0.79, recall of 0.77, and F1-score of 0.78 during cross validation procedures. Feature importance analysis identified baseline keratinised tissue thickness, peri-implant soft tissue phenotype, smoking status as the variables most strongly associated with treatment outcomes.

Discussion. The findings confirm the importance of keratinized mucosa for peri-implant tissue stability and support SCTG as a predictable approach for soft tissue augmentation. The adjunctive use of L-PRF may improve postoperative healing because of its regenerative properties. Exploratory machine learning analysis demonstrated the potential feasibility of individualized outcome prediction using integrated clinical and biological variables in implant dentistry.

Conclusion. Machine learning-based analysis demonstrated potential feasibility for individualised prediction of peri-implant soft tissue augmentation outcomes following SCTG and L-PRF use. Baseline peri-implant soft tissue  characteristics and patient-related factors appear to significantly influence postoperative healing and esthetic outcomes. The present findings should be considered exploratory and hypnotises-generating. Further multicentre studies with larger independent datasets and external validation are required before routine clinical implementation of machine learning-based predictive models in implant dentistry._x001D_

Keywords: dental implantation, soft tissue augmentation, connective tissue graft, predictive modeling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *